Jon, I know we should have thought of easier to type name :-) Yes the plan is to put them in the 305 bugfix area after testing is done. -connie On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jon Peatfield wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Connie Sieh wrote: > > > I have rebuilt all of the "generic"(did not have SL modifications)s rpm > > for Update 6 for i386 and x86_64. > > > > These rpms are available from > > > > ftp://ftp.scientific.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/i386/errata/bugfix/RPMS/ > > ftp://ftp.scientific.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/x86_64/errata/bugfix/RPMS/ > > It took me 5 attempts before I noticed that it should probably be: > > ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/... > > ftp.scientific.org seems to belong to a totally different project :-) > > > Both of these areas are yumable. > > > > The only Update 6 rpms that are NOT included here are > > > > anaconda-9.1.6.8-2.RHEL.src.rpm Have to put in the SL changes > > redhat-artwork-0.73.3-2E.src.rpm Have to put in the SL changes > > firstboot-1.1.33-1.src.rpm Have to put in the SL changes > > redhat-release-3AS-13.6.2.src.rpm This turns into sl-release > > > > The Update 6 kernel was just released to the "errata" area as it is a > > security errata. > > > > Please test these rpms and let us know if there are any issues with them. > > Is the plan to put them into: > > .../linux/scientific/305/.../errata/bugfix/RPMS/ > > once they have been tested enough? If so I ought to check that my scripts > know to rsync that from your servers... > > > Thanks > > > > -Connie Sieh > >