Note that a new kernel security errata was released yesterday by RedHat.

-Connie Sieh

On 
Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Howdy,
> I want a second or third opinion on this.
> Currently, there are 3 different openafs versions on the S.L. 3.0.x 
> versions.
> SL 301 - openafs-1.2.10
> SL 302,3,4 - openafs-1.2.11
> SL 305 - openafs-1.2.13
> 
> I believe I said before, that with the next security kernel update, I'd 
> like to move them all up to the same version.  If I didn't, I meant to.
> 
> Does this sound like a good idea?  (I still think it does)
> 
> If it does, I was planning on doing openafs-1.2.13-15.17.SL
> This is the same openafs as was released in S.L. 3.0.5, but has the init 
> script fixed to work properly with LSB.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Troy
> 
>