Note that a new kernel security errata was released yesterday by RedHat. -Connie Sieh On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Troy Dawson wrote: > Howdy, > I want a second or third opinion on this. > Currently, there are 3 different openafs versions on the S.L. 3.0.x > versions. > SL 301 - openafs-1.2.10 > SL 302,3,4 - openafs-1.2.11 > SL 305 - openafs-1.2.13 > > I believe I said before, that with the next security kernel update, I'd > like to move them all up to the same version. If I didn't, I meant to. > > Does this sound like a good idea? (I still think it does) > > If it does, I was planning on doing openafs-1.2.13-15.17.SL > This is the same openafs as was released in S.L. 3.0.5, but has the init > script fixed to work properly with LSB. > > Any thoughts? > > Troy > >