Jaroslaw Polok wrote: > Troy Dawson wrote: > >> Troy Dawson wrote: >> > [...] > >> Hi Jarek, >> Sorry for the delay in replying to this. Especially when we're >> releasing. But the end result is that we're sticking with >> yum-2.0.7-11.SL. >> >> In your tests, you never actually said 'Y' to it. If you had you >> would find that when Yum says "Update" it means Update in the same >> sense that rpm says Update. That is, if there is something older, >> then it will really update it, but if that something isn't even >> installed, then it will just install it. >> So yum was working correctly, but I will admit that it is a little >> confusing saying 'Update' when it's really an 'Install' But anyway, >> here is the test of yum-2.0.7-11.SL (with alot of details taken out, >> which I have if you want) > > > I'm terribly sorry to cause the additional (and unnecessary ..) > work for you .. > > Apparently what happened is that I fully tested with 2.0.9 > and then assumed that yum 2.0.11 will behave the same ... > > My fault ... too much autosuggestion :-( > > Thanks for testing this. > > Jarek > It actually wasn't too much trouble. It helped me learn more about what is going on in yum. They say you learn something new everyday ... and that was what I learned that day ;) Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group __________________________________________________