Yup,
It looks like RedHat snuck a new dependancy in on us.  Basically they 
are making you have a package that was bugfix/update and not a security 
errata.  I wish they wouldn't do that, but it sure looks like it's going 
to keep happening.  I'm setting up a way to check for these.  Hopefully 
we can keep this re-occurance down.
I think I've got this fixed for the i386, and x86_64, and we're working 
on the ia64.
Troy
Alan J. Flavell wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Valery Mitsyn wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Michael Mansour wrote:
>>
>>
>>>When I try to apply the gtk2 update on SL 3.0.3 using yum, I get the
> 
>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>>>following problem:
>>>
>>>Resolving dependencies
>>>..conflict between gtk2 and librsvg2
> 
> 
> Yes, we also get this on SL 3.0.3
> 
> 
>>>Any ideas why this would result?
>>
>> Yes, been there...
>>Try: rpm -qa | grep librsvg2
>>and if there are two lines:
>>librsvg2-2.2.3-6
>>librsvg2-2.2.3-2
>>do: rpm -e librsvg2-2.2.3-2
> 
> 
> No, we've only got librsvg2-2.2.3-2 (this is SL 3.0.3, NOT .4).
> 
> 
>>It was from previous partial unsuccessful update of librsvg2.
> 
> 
> Explicit "rpm -Uvh gtk2-2.2.4-15.i386.rpm" produces a more
> informative report:
> 
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         librsvg2 < 2.2.3-3 conflicts with gtk2-2.2.4-15
> 
> However, there is no update for librsvg2 in 3.0.3.  The only available 
> version is the distributed version as originally installed, i.e 
> librsvg2-2.2.3-2 as cited above.  
> 
> I don't know whether you're right or not, about some other version 
> (3.0.4, I guess), but I don't think this is the answer for 3.0.3, 
> sorry...


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________