Yup, It looks like RedHat snuck a new dependancy in on us. Basically they are making you have a package that was bugfix/update and not a security errata. I wish they wouldn't do that, but it sure looks like it's going to keep happening. I'm setting up a way to check for these. Hopefully we can keep this re-occurance down. I think I've got this fixed for the i386, and x86_64, and we're working on the ia64. Troy Alan J. Flavell wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Valery Mitsyn wrote: > > >>On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Michael Mansour wrote: >> >> >>>When I try to apply the gtk2 update on SL 3.0.3 using yum, I get the > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > >>>following problem: >>> >>>Resolving dependencies >>>..conflict between gtk2 and librsvg2 > > > Yes, we also get this on SL 3.0.3 > > >>>Any ideas why this would result? >> >> Yes, been there... >>Try: rpm -qa | grep librsvg2 >>and if there are two lines: >>librsvg2-2.2.3-6 >>librsvg2-2.2.3-2 >>do: rpm -e librsvg2-2.2.3-2 > > > No, we've only got librsvg2-2.2.3-2 (this is SL 3.0.3, NOT .4). > > >>It was from previous partial unsuccessful update of librsvg2. > > > Explicit "rpm -Uvh gtk2-2.2.4-15.i386.rpm" produces a more > informative report: > > error: Failed dependencies: > librsvg2 < 2.2.3-3 conflicts with gtk2-2.2.4-15 > > However, there is no update for librsvg2 in 3.0.3. The only available > version is the distributed version as originally installed, i.e > librsvg2-2.2.3-2 as cited above. > > I don't know whether you're right or not, about some other version > (3.0.4, I guess), but I don't think this is the answer for 3.0.3, > sorry... -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group __________________________________________________