Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:06:08 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 01:48, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> > yum.cron - keep it the same or redo it?
>
> - What about using up2date (from FC3) with yum
> repositories behind ?
> (there are some goodies there: alike selecting
> 'nearest' repository server .. etc)
>
Yum is nicer for scripts (e.g. cron jobs) than up2date. FC3 allows the
use of yum or up2date and I much prefer yum. Yum will also
automatically select a repository (based on some unknown [to me]
algorithm). It took me a while to discover how to turn this off and use
my own choice of repository. Of course both yum and up2date are
available and you can take your pick.
Since I have about 50 SL machines I keep a local mirror of the part of
the SL repository we use. For that reason I would prefer that
/etc/yum.conf not be overwritten on an upgrade. Of course, I may be in
the minority on this.
--
John Franks <[log in to unmask]>
Dept of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ
|
|
|