John,

Thanks for telling me about this.

I will sign them.

-connie sieh

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, John Franks wrote:

> Hi Connie,
>
> I tried this with good success, but I noticed that the following
> packages are apparently not signed.
>
> [root@gauss RPMS]# rpm --checksig *rpm | grep -v gpg
> anaconda-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> anaconda-runtime-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> GFS-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> GFS-devel-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> GFS-modules-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> GFS-modules-hugemem-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> GFS-modules-smp-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> rpmdb-SL-303-0.20040922.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
>
> I normally use gpgcheck=1 in my yum.conf so yum balked.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 23:40, csieh wrote:
> > Scientific Linux (SL) Release  30rolling        September 8, 2004
> >
> > Please send bug reports to the bug tracker that is at
> >
> >         http://www.scientificlinux.org
> >
>
>
>