John, Thanks for telling me about this. I will sign them. -connie sieh On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, John Franks wrote: > Hi Connie, > > I tried this with good success, but I noticed that the following > packages are apparently not signed. > > [root@gauss RPMS]# rpm --checksig *rpm | grep -v gpg > anaconda-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > anaconda-runtime-9.1.3-3.1.SL.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > GFS-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > GFS-devel-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > GFS-modules-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > GFS-modules-hugemem-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > GFS-modules-smp-6.0.0-10.i686.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > rpmdb-SL-303-0.20040922.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK > > I normally use gpgcheck=1 in my yum.conf so yum balked. > > John > > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 23:40, csieh wrote: > > Scientific Linux (SL) Release 30rolling September 8, 2004 > > > > Please send bug reports to the bug tracker that is at > > > > http://www.scientificlinux.org > > > > >