Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 2004 10:24:21 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>>> "Connie" == Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> writes:
Connie> Scientific Linux (SL) Release Candidate 2 May 3, 2004
Connie> This is only a summary of the changes made since the release of April 26,
Connie> 2004.
Connie> Release is expected next week.
Connie, thanks for all your work and the nice documentation. I feel I
owe you some comments, even if I haven't managed to convert our own
distribution to SL (yet), lack of time but not of interest.
* you are shipping a number of zz_* RPMS in the "base" SL distribution
- I understood that this prefix was actually used for Fermi-specific
customizations in the past, and I wonder whether these should appear
in the general release:
zz_desktop_tweeks-1.1-1
zz_inittab_change-1.0-4
zz_kernel_clean-1.0-2
zz_libg2c.a_change-3.2.3-1
zz_no_colorls-1.0-1
zz_sendmail_accept-1.0-2
* You also seem to have a number of RedHat-compiled RPMs in the
distribution, which could be problematic because of the "update service
license" for Red Hat Enterprise. I haven't checked whether all of these
RPMs come directly from RHE3 (but at least some like xfig do, same timestamps):
rpm -qp --nosignature --qf "%-30{NAME}\t%{VENDOR}\t%{BUILDHOST}\n" linux/scientific/30rolling/i386/SL/RPMS/*rpm | grep -i "redhat" | wc -l
300
I suggest at least to check whether all of these are "legal" to ship
(coming e.f from Fedora), and perhaps replace them with e.g. the
CERN-recompiled ones from http://linuxsoft/cern/cel3/i386/RedHat/RPMS/
Best regards
jan
|
|
|