Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:57:35 -0600 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Yumdownloader relies on repository names ending in -source to tell
> whether or not it should enable them when one runs ``yumdownloader
> --source $package'' to grab the source for an rpm. But unlike most
> repositories, SL's source repository is called "sl-srpms" instead of
> "sl-source", so the program doesn't work correctly for anything in the
> SL base repositories.
>
> Is there some historical reason for SL's strange naming scheme? Is it
> something that can change in a later release like 6.x?
I had no idea that naming the repository had any impact on any part of
yum. It's sorta a bad hack in my opinion. I would think that it would
actually look at the rpm's in question.
That being said, I have no problem renaming the source repositories.
Was it historic. Yes.
We said to ourselves
"What should we name the repository for the source rpms?"
"Well, they are always in a directory called SRPMS, let call it srpms."
"But we should distinguish it so they know it's the Scientific Linux
source rpms."
"OK, then let's call it sl-srpms"
And there you have your historic moment. :)
I've never actually used yum and the source rpms.
Does yum have any way of knowing that something is a src.rpm or not ...
other than a repostory name?
(I've looked in the man page and I'm not seeing anything)
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|