SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:04:56 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Troy Dawson said...

|It really comes down to your application.  If possible, try it on two 
|comparable CPU setups, one AMD and one Intel.  I've seen some wildly lopsided 
|tests, try to at least give them the same amount of memory and the same disks.
|Then run your application on it, and see which is faster.
|
|That's how I decided I like the Opteron.  On my tests (recompiling rpm's) the 
|Opteron beat the Xeon.  But I saw other people with the exact same setup, and 
|for them the Xeon beat the Opteron.  It all came down to the application.

And that can change over time.  For years
we bought only AMD-based systems, because
most of our apps consistently ran better
on them.  Then we found a couple that were
decidely better on INtel.  When we tested
equivalent servers for the last set of
compute farm systems, Intel won hands down.

-Miles

ATOM RSS1 RSS2