Please post the output of ldd


--regards

Prosun Prodhan 09339192066(M)
Registered Linux User # 318610
(LiCo : http://www.linuxcounter.net, formerly http://counter.li.org)

Use Open Document Format. Try  OpenOffice (http://www.openoffice.org) or
LibreOffice (http://www.libreoffice.org) - Free Of Cost.

[When you say, "I wrote a program that crashed Windows," people just stare
at you blankly and say, "Hey, I got those with the system, for free."  -
Linus Torvalds]

NOTICE:
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain malware -
harmful to the system. The sender therefore does not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in the contents/attachments of this message, which
arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Please note that this is a
PERSONAL mail-id and any views or opinions presented in this email are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any
company.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>
>
> On 27 April 2015 at 15:07, Ken Teh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I have a user who has installed an executable built on a other Linux
>> distro.  Claims it was built on a 64-bit linux (doubtful).  He has no
>> problems running it on a 32-bit SL6.x machine but cannot run it on a 64-bit
>> SL6.x machine.  Chokes with the following:
>>
>> ...:/lib/ld-linux.so: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory.
>>
>> I'm wondering if it is "safe" to add a symbolic link to the
>> ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 to fix this.
>>
>
> Probably not. I would check to see what ldd on the binary says it is
> trying to do. If this was built on a system that doesn't understand
> multi-lib that EL uses.. you are probably up schlock kreek without a
> paddle. I believe the other method that is used is running the 32 bit in a
> 'chroot' and they don't play well if not in that or similar.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>