 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2011 11:07:45 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| In-Reply-To: |
<1305210014.2102.40.camel@machine-laptop> |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:20, Miguel Angel Diaz
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I agree with you that packages have their own licenses.
>
> But my question follows in other way. Imagine I want to create
> other .iso based on S.L.iso. I need to read .iso license to know if I am
> doing well.
>
> Regards.
>
>
Ok I understand the question, and will try to better explain it to others.
A package by itself has a license, but so does the distribution as a
whole. The Fedora distribution and original Red Hat Linux distribution
were licensed under the GPL v2. Miguel is wondering what license Fermi
is offering the distribution under as this affects how others can use
the distribution, derive child distributions etc from it.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
|
|
|
