SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:36:28 +0100
Reply-To:
Lars Behrens <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Where to report bug?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms010101090608030501020909"
From:
Lars Behrens <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (341 bytes) , smime.p7s (5 kB) 
Am 31.01.2018 um 14:37 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:

 Scientific Linux is a rebuild of Red Hat, so that looks like it should
> be reported to Red Hat, https://bugzilla.redhat.com

But will they accept it with:

[...]
os_release:     Scientific Linux release 7.3 (Nitrogen)
[...]
pkg_vendor:     Scientific Linux

After all I am not a paying Redhat customer.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2