Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:54:06 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030002030506070509080508" |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
CERN |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 01/09/2014 02:37 PM, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
> My US$0.02, it seems like maybe RedHat wants something in between the
> stable, solid, reliable, and, yes, sometimes dated Enterprise Linux
> and the wild & crazy :) world of Fedora.
As far i understood nothing will change with regard of data path for
distribution of CentOS (it will be the same process of taking _released_
srpms, clean up, rebuild). RH just extend an administrative umbrella
(and some significant support) over the CentOS organization.
Anyway, as rebuilding and re-branding is quite intensive i was wondering
if the differences between centos and sl could be packed in some repo
(as most (that i know of) of the cern scientific software is already put
into).
What technical differences would be between CentOS + scientific repo and SL?
Just a personal thought, but maybe this would free some human resources
for maintaining a lot of scientific (and IT/grid related) packages in
well established repos (like epel, fedora/rpmfusion)
Thanks!
Adrian
|
|
|