SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:23:30 +1000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Alex Kruchkoff <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Alex Kruchkoff <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
There is a security vulnerability has been discovered in FF3, FF2:

http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2008/06/18/vulnerability-in-mozilla-firefox-30

Just wonder if firefox-1.5.0.12-15.el5_1.i386 is safe?

Cheers
Alex

Troy Dawson wrote, On 06/20/2008 03:54 AM:
> Jon Peatfield wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>
>>> Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2 for i386        June 
>>> 17, 2008
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Just to be unpopular I'm hoping that the full release *won't* happen 
>> 'til
>> after TUV release the firefox-3 (proper version)...
>>
>> I just checked and the fedora development (was rawhide) just (well on 
>> the
>> 18th) got a srpm of 3.0 (final) so I suspect that QA will mean that 
>> the EL
>> release won't happen for a while (not that the fedora package is
>> maintained by the same people but...)
>>
>
> Well ... that question does make you unpopular :)
> Just kidding.
>
> Firefox will not affect the release schedule, although, yes, it would 
> be nice if the non-beta was in there.
> In talking with RedHat (I'm at their summit, so I can literally talk 
> with them) they said that there really hasn't been many changes to 
> firefox since the beta they released, but that they are working on 
> getting it out soon.
>
> Troy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2