SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 2017 04:54:19 -0400
Reply-To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: RAID 6 array and failing harddrives
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: SL Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:50 AM, David Sommerseth
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> ZFS looks great, so does btrfs - on the paper. But until ZFS is native
> in Linux or btrfs stabilizes on the same level as ext4 and XFS, I'm
> not going that path for production environments.

What do you mean by "native?"

The upstream deb and rpm files use dkms (as well as kmod for RHEL and
clones) and Ubuntu ships zfs pre-compiled. This is "native" in my
book.

I've used and am using zfs in production on Linux and it's good and stable.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2