SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:39:08 -0400
Reply-To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: 7.4
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Tom H <[log in to unmask]> cc: SL Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
They're notably larger than weekly updates, they tend to restart
daemons (not always successfully), and the local yum metadata ideally
needs to be cleared before updating from it to avoid obsolete
repodata.

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Tom H <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:16 AM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Any rumors on when 7.4 will hit SL?
>
> Why are you always so keen about dot-releases?
>
> Do you perform installs for every dot-release or are you using
> versioned yum repos (the latter doesn't make sense if you always
> switch to the latest dot-release)?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2