SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2017

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 21:28:37 -0400
Reply-To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Cad package move to 6.9
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]> cc: "Francesco M. Taurino" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Andrew C Aitchison
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017, Francesco M. Taurino wrote:
>
>> Hi, if you only require 2d cad, take a look to draftsight, from dassault
>> systemes. I don't know if new versions run on so 6.x, but it's basically
>> free and worth a try.
>
>
> I tried that; draftsight installs as an .rpm which is nice, but sadly
> it fails to run on SL6, wanting /lib64/libc.so.6 version 'GLIBC_2.14'
> but SL6 only has libc upto 'GLIBC_2.12'.

Looks like it's packaged for a contemporary Fedora? That may not be
feasible to port to SL 6 without SRPM's.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2