SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:37:31 +0300
Reply-To:
Semi <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
SL to 6.3 release
From:
Semi <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
1) When the SL6.3 is expected? Centos 6.3 already exists.

2) When I run update from Centos I also updating the release number.

For example:
from Centos 5.2
yum update
I'll get Centos 5.8

and SL doesn't raises the release version ?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2