SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:47 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (531 bytes) , text/html (935 bytes)
2011/5/25 Tom H <[log in to unmask]>

> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Zack Yovel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > Problem is both SL and Ubuntu recognize my raid array as mirror, instead
> of
> > RAID 0.
>
> I'm shooting in the dark because I've never used dmraid but do you
> have Windows set up with a raid 1 array?
>

No array's at all. I did attempt RAID 1 and RAID 0 on Windows and Linux only
to find out it doesn't work and undo all changes. Still linux keeps saying
my disks belong to some king of RAID. Something in the MBR, maybe?


ATOM RSS1 RSS2