SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:44:50 -0500
Reply-To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: why not 2.6.32-573.7.1 ?
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Matthieu Guionnet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
It was published on 9/29/2015

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/x86_64/updates/fastbugs/repoview/kernel.html

Pat

On 10/01/2015 09:39 AM, Matthieu Guionnet wrote:
> Hi,
> why the kernel 2.6.32-573.7.1 had never been released for SL6 ?
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1827.html
> It was for Centos 6 also
> Thanks
>

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2