SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:37:43 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Radu-Cristian Fotescu <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Radu-Cristian Fotescu <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
quoted-printable
Comments:
To: Chris O'Regan <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> We've chosen SL because it closely resembles the
> original distribution. We have hardware and software
> that only supports this flavour of Linux. Any deviation
> could lead us into a situation where we get no support

Sorry to say, but CentOS is 100% cloning TUV,
and StartCom AS is 99.999% like TUV.

SL has quite a lot of additions (read the relnotes)!

But, given the exact packages, I don't see how could they
affect your compatibility!


> Quite frankly, if you are looking for a Linux distro 
> that has all the latest bells and whistles 

Quite frankly, I am not looking for that.


Cheers,
R-C

ATOM RSS1 RSS2