Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:54:39 +0800 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-15 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Winnie Lacesso wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We'll buy server hardware soon to run a critical app that requires SL3.
> Upgrade to SL4 later is probably a go, but initially it must be SL3.
If your new CPU supports virtualisation, then running SL3 in a virtual
machine under SL5 changes the question quite a deal, and may also give
you the option of running additional loads (including Windows if needed).
>
> So SL308 would load with 2.4.21-47.0.1.ELsmp & yum update to
> 2.4.21-50.ELsmp.
>
> The hardware may have Tyan S2925G2NR mobo which has nvidia nForce Pro 3400
> chipset, with nvidia MCP55 SATA controller.
>
> Some hunting shows:
>
> . SL3.0.8 release notes: Nvidia Nforce(motherboard chipset) drivers:
> IDE is supported. NO SUPPORT for ethernet, audio, sata.
>
> That sounds bad. But:
>
> . "Newer NVIDIA chipsets are AHCI, and use the ahci driver not sata_nv"
> . both sata_nv & ahci drivers in SL3
> . both sata_nv & ahci driver said "production" maturity
> . "libata AHCI driver ahci became available starting 2.4.29-preX ..."
> (that's later than SL308 kernel)
>
> Questions:
>
> . would the version of the ahci driver in SL3 be older than the version in
> SL4?
>
> . If it is older, would an older ahci driver version in SL3 have any
> problem driving the nvidia MCP55 (or possibly even newer if a newer mobo)
> SATA controller?
>
> . If ahci can't or won't, will SL3 understand to use sata_nv driver
> instead?
> And would sata_nv have any problem driving the nvidia MCP55 (or possibly
> even newer if a newer mobo) SATA controller?
>
>
> many many thanks
>
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]
Please do not reply off-list
|
|
|