Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:13:19 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 07:02 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> In this regard, is anyone using Ubuntu LTS in a production
>>> environment? Is it fact both stable and (reasonably) hardened (e.g.,
>>> not a consume/enthusiast product such as MS Win or RH Fedora)?
>>
>> On the desktop, there are far more Windows systems deployed than Linux
>> ones...
>
> First, in many parts of the world other than the USA, MS Windows is
> not that well deployed even on the desktop except that many machines
> come with MS Windows pre-installed.
In the corporate world, Windows dominates the desktop (it also
dominates the desktop in the consumer/home world). So Windows is a
"production" OS.
|
|
|