Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:47:50 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Andrew,
I appreciate everyone's curiosity!
Until we've finished our research/evaluation/and_so_on we are trying not
to say very much on this topic.
It isn't so much about secrecy as we don't want to fuel speculation on
things that aren't fully understood.
I strongly encourage reading the documentation at CentOS and Redhat on
this topic.
I realize this silence is probably very frustrating to lots of people,
and I'm sorry about that.
Pat
On 01/09/2014 04:05 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
>
> What it be possible to share some details of the call?
>
> On Jan 9, 2014 4:44 PM, "Connie Sieh" <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
> We are in the process of researching/evaluating this news and
> how it impacts Scientific Linux.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
>
> We were invited by Redhat/Centos to a conference call yesterday to
> discuss the Centos / Redhat project.
>
> We discussed details about this project and its impact on
> Scientific Linux.
>
> We are continuing our research.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/
|
|
|