SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:00:02 +0000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject:
Re: Any 'best' hard drives and incremental backup approaches to home systems?
From:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<0F0AFCE398A64FBF8AC5CC74D9FBF3B2@neilhp>
Content-transfer-encoding:
QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Comments:
To: Neil Aggarwal <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
2009/12/6 Neil Aggarwal <[log in to unmask]>:

>> Which are the best marks of hard drives to purchase,
>> especially for linux-based systems that can be on for
>> relatively long periods -- 6-24 hours a day?
>
> I use Seagate drives on all my servers.  They are running
> Linux and are on 24x7.  Failures are very rare and Seagate
> replaces anything that fails within 5 years with no
> hassle.

+1 to Seagate. :-)

Alan.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2