SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:39:39 +0000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Phil Perry <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Phil Perry <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: scientific-linux-users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On 12/11/10 23:31, Bluejay Adametz wrote:
>> Is APC (or some other make) preferred over tripplite as a linux friendly
>> ups?  Is everyone using nut or are the vendor supplied software good enough?
>
> I've got a couple of SL 5.0-with-recent-updates machines with
> late-model APC UPSs connected via USB, and the UPS parameters/status
> do show up in dbus. I haven't seen any comprehensive software to
> monitor these UPSs, but then I haven't looked real hard either.
>

I've always used "apcupsd" to control my APC UPS, available from Dag's 
rpmforge repo. There's even some cgi scripts so you can monitor UPS 
status over http.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2