SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:27:22 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject:
Re: SL 5.6 released?
From:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> However, someone from CERN IT (discussing some experiment software which
> seems to break on 5.6) has just told a grid deployment meeting that:
>  "FNAL released SL 5.6 last week"
> Clearly either my understanding is flawed or his is; which is it please?

If CERN IT security allows us to know what component of the OS was
involved, inquiring minds want to know :)

kind regards/ldv

ATOM RSS1 RSS2