LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2016

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

	LISTSERV Archives
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Home
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS March 2016

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:23:33 +0100
Reply-To:	Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: named-chroot issue - AGAIN
From:	Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Comments:	To: SL Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (17 lines)

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:53 PM, David Sommerseth
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Not going to argue that this could have been done better, I agree with you
> here. On the other hand, maybe *that* is one reason it takes time to get this
> issue resolved too? That Red Hat QE is working on improving the situation,
> adding needed regression tests and so on for this use case. I know I'm
> speculating now, but I also know that these guys really do their best to avoid
> painful experiences for users and customers. Unfortunately, they do mistakes
> - as we all do from time to time.

Given the
https://git.centos.org/blobdiff/rpms!bind.git/d56ed2d3a2736a07a09c268f3b2607cca8f1b6ca/SOURCES!named-chroot.service
commit, there's probably a lot of hype in RH's QA marketing claims.
I'm not implying that there's no QA at all but, in this case, if there
was any, it sucked.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV