SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 04:14:19 -0400
Reply-To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Re: SL on ARM
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: SL Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Not likely. SL is a rebuild of an upstream vendor's industry class server
> OS.  If our favorite upstream vendor goes there, then that could happen. But
> if you look at Fedora as the leading edge of what that vendor plans for the
> next generation, I see no major pursuit of ARM in the next major release. Do
> you?

Fedora's considering "upgrading" ARM to a primary architecture for F18:

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/830

ATOM RSS1 RSS2