SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:41:02 +0900
Reply-To:
zxq9 <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: slow usb
From:
zxq9 <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
On 06/24/2012 02:03 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> SL 6.2 64 bit
>
> Has anyone noticed that their USB 2.0 ports are really,
> really slow?
>
> If I need to copy anything substantial to my USB 2 sticks,
> I boot into Fedora Live 17 Xfce 64 bit CD. Then it goes
> about 20 times faster than under SL 6.2.
>
> Anyone have a work around?

I haven't noticed this, but then again I haven't messed with large data 
over USB in a pretty long time.

Out of curiosity, what speeds are you seeing, specifically? Like average 
Mb/s on SL vs average Mb/s on Fedora.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2