SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:31:30 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject:
Re: so the "install" DVD is what most approximates TUV?
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <[log in to unmask]> cc: Scientific Linux Users List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   almost certainly a straightforward question but i want to put
> together a box that very closely approximates RHEL for some testing
> and, as i read it, if i want to simulate installing RHEL, i should
> install from the single "Install" DVD, is that correct?  thanks.
> 
> rday
> 

Correct,
There is one catch to that.  We combined the package list from both 
Server and Client.  The biggest difference between the two is that 
openoffice isn't on the Server.  And several server based programs 
aren't on the Client.  But both openoffice and those servers are on our 
"Install" DVD.

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2