SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: slow usb
From:
Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:21:53 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (641 bytes) , text/html (1079 bytes) 
Different usb modules?
On Jun 24, 2012 5:17 PM, "Todd And Margo Chester" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> On 06/23/2012 10:41 PM, zxq9 wrote:
>
>  Out of curiosity, what speeds are you seeing, specifically? Like average
>> Mb/s on SL vs average Mb/s on Fedora.
>>
>
>
> It "seems" (note "weasel" word) like things go 20 times faster on
> Fedora.  I haven't actually measured it.
>
> Typically what I am trying to copy is contents of a data
> DVD I am creating for a customer from my hard drive -- about
> 3 GB.  From SL it takes about four hours to copy.  From
> Fedora, it takes about 15 minutes.
>
> It acts as if SL is on USB 1 and Fedora in on USB 2.
>
> -T
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2