 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:31:27 -0700 |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:10:22PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>
> That's why I pictured IT plus other corporate authorities. When you
> compromise security on a company's network you give away the keys to
> the corporate kingdom. That can, has, and should lead to a firing.
>
> Having a password that doesn't meet spec is a whole different
> ballgame.
>
None of this makes sense. Installing a wifi hotspot in a locked
room in a locked building (where it cannot possibly be accessed
by unauthorised people) is a firing offense but using the same
password for root and for yahoo is ok (or just a slap on the wrist).
--
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada
|
|
|
