SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:18:39 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15
Subject:
Re: problem with acroread SLC on SL4.8
From:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Franchisseur Robert <[log in to unmask]>, Liste SL-users FNAL <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Hello,

Franchisseur Robert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> we have recently noticed that acroread-9.3.3-1.slc4 from the 
> repo http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/cern/slc4X/$basearch/yum/updates/
> 
> takes almost 100% of the CPU. 
> 
> Scientific Linux SL release 4.8 (Beryllium)
> Linux reynolds.lmd.jussieu.fr 2.6.9-89.0.26.EL #1 Wed Jun 16 04:44:53 CDT 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> Does anybody see the same behavior ?

Yes, it is a known feature. Just don't use acroread...

Matthias

>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2