SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 May 2011 14:32:17 +0200
Reply-To:
Frank Lanitz <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Re: Version of GPL license
From:
Frank Lanitz <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In-Reply-To:
<1305201222.2102.24.camel@machine-laptop>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Am 12.05.2011 13:53, schrieb Miguel Angel Diaz:
> For each package there is a license, but it should exist a license for
> SL. 
> 
> For example, in Centos you can find a file (GPU.txt or EULA.txt) in a
> mirror  http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/5.5/os/x86_64/ . These files show
> version of GPL license.
> 
> Did anyone find these files to SL ?

Its just not possible IMHO to bundle the iso with one and only license.
I'd suggest to check the license of each package or go deeper into
detail, why you need this information at all.

Cheers,
Frank

ATOM RSS1 RSS2