SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:34:16 -1000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Donald Tripp <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: Scientific linux for SPARC
From:
Donald Tripp <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
To: Henry Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines) 
I recommend CentOS. Its another Redhat rebuild, like SL, but it does  
have a port for SPARC. I am using CentOS on several machines, and  
have a good experience with it.

http://www.centos.org/

- Don


On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Henry Rodriguez wrote:

> Hi.
> I need to install SL on a Sun Netra T1 sparc and i
> notice that there's no SL version for sparc
> arquitecture.
> I'm wondering if someone knows what other OS can i use
> insted of SL.
> I knows that there's a bunch of OS for sparc, but i
> really need to use a very similar OS to SL.
> I'll be waiting for your anwser.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2