SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:00:02 +1000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Comments:
To: Aldo Saavedra <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi Aldo,

> Hi,
> 
> We are thinking upgrading our server for our home directories.. we 
> have t wo choices and I was wondering if anyobdy had experience 
> running SL on either of the
> m..
> 
> The first choice is a DELL PowerEdge(TM) 2950 Server.
> 
> The second choice is a computer that is manufacturer by a local 
> company w ith the following features:

Why not just consider one of the HP Proliant range of servers?

DL360's, DL380's or their AMD Opteron equivalents (DL365's or DL385's).

I find Proliants (even from the older Compaq days) to be some of the best kit
I ever bought, and over the years I've tried various Dell, Acer, IBM, etc servers.

I currently run a range of DL360's and DL380's and couldn't be happier with
them. Fully Linux (RH, SUSE, Debian) supported, remote management (console,
power, etc) and hardware/snmp agents to monitor the hardware.

I run SL exclusively these days btw, from SL308 (one server left on that) to
many SL4.4's.

Regards,

Michael.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2