SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ONeal, Miles" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ONeal, Miles
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:03:15 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1495 bytes) , text/html (43 kB)
At my previous job, we used it for microprocessor development, along with commercial tools and the Torque/Moab batch queuing system. The software tools team used it as well.

I used it on al our home computers for several years but eventually switched to Fedora to be able to use more recent desktop software.



-Miles



On Feb 24, 2020, at 08:09, Peter Willis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:





Caution: EXTERNAL email







Hello,



The variation in uses of t Scientific Linux is quite interesting.

As mentioned before, we are using it for fluid dynamics modelling and oceanography, in the context of parallel computing with OpenMP and MPICH.



I am curious to see what everyone else have been using it for.



Perhaps, if it’s not too much trouble, people on the list might give a short blurb about how they use it and why.

Maybe also mention others they know who are using it who are not on this list.



Peter







>I'm no scientist, just an electronics guy who do a lot of research in RF (as hobby, mostly testing antennas for ham radio in VHF bands) from Argentina.

>

>Fot SL the most "well done" linux distribution, for people who simply knows.

>

>Will look forward to move to another distribution.

>

>

>>I'm an independent electronics inventor, heavily dependent

>>on both competent software and competent laboratory science,

>>both for the knowledge I depend on and the tools I use to

>>transform that knowledge into products and services for

>>my customers.

>>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2