SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:41:41 -0500
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
about realtime system
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Kim Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Hi all,
  I find scientific linux in NI (Labview)'s page. I find that labview support
linux systems including scientific linux from ver 2011. I am going to
build a system with labview installed on this OS. The reason that I
don't use MS windows is the time slice control is pretty bad and most
time I need to control the timing in an acceptable precision. I don't
have NI's realtime system but I am looking for a free linux OS which
supports realtime kernel. So I wonder does anyone have experience in
this on scientific linux? Does it support realtime kernel? Does it
really make difference in timing control comparing to non-realtime
kernel? Thanks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2