SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
SL Speed vs Fedora and CentOS
From:
Lou Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:11:14 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Comments:
To: FermiLab SL Users List server <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Lou Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
I wanted to know if the SL distribution was designed specifically to be fast.

I am running a CentOS V5.3 and found that it is noticeably slower than
Fedora 11, to my great surprise.

How does the SL distro compare for speed?

I had planned to use the CERN or Fermi Lab version of SL if SL runs faster.

-- 
Lou.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2