Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:02:01 -0600 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
Univ. of Minnesota Soudan Underground Lab |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
DocDB?
http://docdb.fnal.gov/doc/
-Dave
Ken Teh wrote:
> I asked a question earlier about wikis and your recommendations for
> wikis. After more reading and discussion, it seems to me that a wiki may
> not be quite what we are after.
>
> Essentially, what we need is some sort of groupware for a collaboration
> that
> is just beginning to get off the ground. I gather from the collaboration
> that what they want is a web front-end to a central repository when they
> can
> archive stuff like meeting notes, detector design drawings, etc., over the
> lifetime of the project. After hearing your recommendations, I tried out
> mediawiki. It's my impression that wikis are more suitable for on-going
> discussions of topics.
>
> It's been suggested to me that a CMS may be more appropriate. So, once
> again, I asked for your recommendations and advice. A brief comparison of
> the two --- wiki versus cms --- and your recommendation for a cms system.
>
> Thanks! Ken
|
|
|