SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2018

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:42:57 +0000
Reply-To:
Dan <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
H264 codec
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<alpine.LRH.2.21.1801211725150.23688@shepherd>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Dan <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Scientific Linux Users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Dear All,

I'm vaguely aware that the standard SL (and presumably RHEL)
repositories don't contain any decoder for the H264 video codec,
because someone, somewhere considers the codec to be too heavily
patent-encumbered to distribute the decoder.  I'm also vaguely aware
that some other GNU/Linux distros _do_ distribute H264 decoders.  Does
anyone have any information about _why_ different distros have
reached different decisions about this question of law, please?

Kind regards,

Dan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2