SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2021

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jan 2021 11:26:05 -0500
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Rhel 8
From:
Serguei Mokhov <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Mark Rousell <[log in to unmask]> cc: Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Mark Rousell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>

> BUT... the fact that SysVInit is seen as outdated is NOT a reason in and of itself to support SystemD.
> There may have been and, in many people's opinion, there were and are better init systems
> to replace SysVInit than SystemD. "Better" being both a technical and a political/social/industrial construct.

Mark, please name the better ones. And possibly why have they not been
widely adopted?

(PS: Lamar, appreciate as always your PostgreSQL contributions and its
package management.)

-- 
Serguei Mokhov

ATOM RSS1 RSS2