Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:54:04 +0800 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Connie and all,
Indeed I was stupid. I installed the Intel compilers, but the PATH was
pointing primarily to
the ia32 version of the compiler. Now I uninstalled everything and
install the EM64T version alone,
and it seems everything works.
I shall have a happy Christmas without having to reinstall the OS. 8)
Regrads,
Kuo Kan LIANG
Division of Mechanics,
Research Center for Applied Sciences,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan
>Kuo Kan,
>
>Have you asked Intel about the issues you had with their compilers?
>
>-Connie Sieh
>
>On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Kuo Kan Liang wrote:
>
>
>
>>Thank Troy and Connie for the `positive' 'negative' answers toward other
>>solutions instead of reinstallation.
>>I will do that. Actually before asking those questions, I have already
>>educated myself that I will do this before Christmas.
>>
>>One thing that makes me really sorry for doing this is that there had
>>been many people in this mailing list
>>encourging me to use x86_64 Linux instead of i386 Linux.
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|