SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2020

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Willis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Peter Willis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:32:41 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1321 bytes) , text/html (46 kB)
Hello,

Thanks to everyone for clarifying the future status of SL.
I guess it's time to start researching he docs for Ubuntu/Debian or something.
 
Looks like we need to revise our computing cluster plan.
The computer here is pretty small with only two nodes and a controller totalling 112 CPUs.
We use it for numerical modelling of ocean and river currents and sediment transport (OpenMP/MPICH/FORTRAN).
The changeover will be pretty small. We are still waiting for the OK for a new node or two.
The current nodes are ten years old. The update to a controller and SL7 was a last ditch effort to join the two nodes and increase the scale of the models without costing too much more. 
 
In other news, the link you shared has an article about 'DUNE' which seems like an interesting project.
I'd certainly frostbite a few toes to just stand around and watch that thing run experiments.
 
Thanks for the info,
 
Peter
 
 
>Hello Peter,
> 
>> Is Scientific Linux still active?
>Scientific Linux 6 and 7 will be supported until they are EOL, but there will be no SL8.
> 
>Here is the official announcement from last April:
> 
>https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1904 <https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1904&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=817> &L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=817
> 
>Bonnie King


ATOM RSS1 RSS2