Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2011 18:26:59 +0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
In-Reply-To: |
<1305210014.2102.40.camel@machine-laptop> |
Organization: |
Linux Ink |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Look at "Legal Questions about Scientific Linux" FAQ:
https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal
12/05/2011 16:20 +0200, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I agree with you that packages have their own licenses.
>
> But my question follows in other way. Imagine I want to create
> other .iso based on S.L.iso. I need to read .iso license to know if I am
> doing well.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
> El jue, 12-05-2011 a las 14:32 +0200, Frank Lanitz escribió:
> > Am 12.05.2011 13:53, schrieb Miguel Angel Diaz:
> > > For each package there is a license, but it should exist a license for
> > > SL.
> > >
> > > For example, in Centos you can find a file (GPU.txt or EULA.txt) in a
> > > mirror http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/5.5/os/x86_64/ . These files show
> > > version of GPL license.
> > >
> > > Did anyone find these files to SL ?
> >
> > Its just not possible IMHO to bundle the iso with one and only license.
> > I'd suggest to check the license of each package or go deeper into
> > detail, why you need this information at all.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Frank
|
|
|