 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:00:01 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Content-Type: |
Text/Plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Organization: |
PARI |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Saturday, June 23, 2012 05:07:21 PM Fernando Andrés Muñoz Bravo wrote:
> Yes, I have intalled them... but, as Akemi Yagi says, XFS is disabled by
> default on 32 Bits.
>
> Now, according to this:
>
> " *Yes, you can build your own 32-bit kernel with xfs enabled. However,
> use xfs on 32-bit systems with caution because xfs has problems with
> 4K stack size (x86_64 uses 8k stacks). This is the main reason why
> upstream does not support it. *"
>
> It means, for instance, if my hard disk is external (USB 3.0) its lifetime
> is warning?
XFS can break without warning on 32-bit. I've experienced it; you really need 64-bit for XFS support to be reliable.
|
|
|
